Bring Back Burning at the Stake!

In the Middle Ages, Church and State joined forces to stamp out heretics. Heretics were dangerous because they held different views and beliefs from the officially accepted teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. Church hierarchy very quickly realized that dissenting views and beliefs could undermine the Church’s power and authority over not only their flock, but their hold over the secular leaders as well. The Nobility needed the Church’s blessing to validate their authority over their subjects. So the Church and State formed a symbiotic relationship to protect their status quo on wealth and power.

The Church had a problem when it came to heretics. Being followers of Christ’s teachings and good Christians, they could hunt down and prosecute those who held “dangerous beliefs,” but they could not execute the offenders without soiling their own pious hands. That’s where the State came in. Once the crime of Heretic was pronounced upon an unfortunate soul, the Nobility would step in as the “defender of the Faith” and carry out the dirty work of execution. The most common method of disposing of these troublesome believers was to burn them at the stake. Public burnings of heretics became a really good way to keep the “rank and file” in their place as unquestioning servants of the rich and powerful.

If someone was accused of being a heretic, but refused to confess his sin and repent so that he could then be turned over to the civil authorities and burned at the stake, then it was permissible for the good Christian inquisitors to use torture and other means to illicit a confession from the accused. This gave rise to that wonderfully dark period in Christendom known as the Spanish Inquisition. Officers of the Church were free to interrogate their accused prisoners to the point of death. They learned that pain and fear were amazing tools of the trade in their quest of a confession.

As time progressed, torture became less important to bring people to the stake. Being accused by a neighbor or authorities was often enough to seal their doom. Until the late 1700’s burning at the stake was used as capital punishment for other crimes such as treason and witchcraft. The Age of Enlightenment brought about an end to this form of punishment and replaced it with more “humane” executions like hanging, firing squads, electrocution and now…lethal injection. But, in my view, nothing could compare with the public spectacle of burning at the stake to keep those who see the world differently from contaminating the rest of us with their ideas and beliefs.

If we ever brought back burning at the stake, I could suggest a few “heretics,” if anyone is interested.

Food for THOUGHT…

"Balloon Boy" and the Run Away Media

By now, we all know that the runaway balloon with the little boy inside was a hoax. For a while the saucer-shaped balloon became a media event similar to the helicopter chase of O. J. Simpson. (Remember that?) The networks even cut away from a speech by President Obama to go to live coverage of a daring rescue attempt involving two military helicopters and chase vehicles on the ground. The Denver airport was even closed down for a time as the balloon drifted into the flight paths of the planes. It was very exciting theater.

The next day, the major news outlets were tripping over themselves trying to interview the “relieved” dad and his little boy. I remember watching Good Morning America, as I ate my breakfast that morning, and Diane Sawyer immediately went to a live interview of the whole family. The father was now suspect after the little boy seemed to “spill the beans” during an earlier interview with Larry King. Nevertheless Diane pursued the interview with her inane questions of the father and I watched him “tap-dance” trying to feign offense at the suggestion of a hoax. He was holding the little boy close to him during the interview (better to control him?) when the poor kid said he was going to throw up. To her credit, Diane Sawyer finally broke in and asked if the boy shouldn’t be allowed to go to the bathroom. I expected her to cut away at that point and move on to other stories that morning (like perhaps the President’s speech?). Instead, I watched in disbelief as the father let go of his son and told him not to trip over the wires. Diane broke in again and asked if one of the parents shouldn’t go with the boy. At that point, the mother raised her hand and asked if it was okay that she go take care of him. She had been sitting meekly at the other end of the couch next to the other kids who looked like “deer caught in the headlights.” When the mother finally tip-toed off, I thought surely Diane would cut away to other stories, but no. As we were treated to the little boy retching in the background, Diane kept trying to solicit comments from the other kids (who looked scared to death) while the father continued his rambling discourse. It was agonizing and uncomfortable. Finally, the mother and the little boy returned after much off screen retching. Diane welcomed them back and attempted a few more pointless questions before mercifully breaking away. I have never seen Good Morning America spend 20 minutes of airtime on ANY story, let alone such drivel.

What the hell has happened to journalism and the news business and what is considered newsworthy these days? Have we all been taken in? Have we all been duped? Are we all being lulled to sleep while the rest of the world falls apart? Am I wrong to think that there are more important things to know about? We have pressing issues of healthcare reform, global warming, education and economic recovery to discuss and we spend 20 minutes listening to this publicity hound babble on while his son throws up.

In my lifetime, I have witnessed the death of independent news and integrity. It seems to have been replaced by the rise of corporate media productions with agendas. The news is delivered as entertainment in slick sound bites sandwiched between ads for prescription drugs and Depends undergarments. Our once trusted, stalwart newspapers are dying in this new world of I-pods and online news. Bloggers and paparazzi have replaced journalists and investigative reporters. I suggest that our “Fourth Estate” has been hijacked and manipulated to the point that I don’t know who to trust for accurate, comprehensive and fair news of the day. Where do I go to get unbiased and complete information on things I need to know in a world that reveres FOX News and the likes of Bill O’Reilly, Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck?

Where is Walter Cronkite when we need him?

Food for THOUGHT...